More applications sounds like an obvious recruiting win. But a recent Indeed study suggests that the relationship between application volume and hiring success is not quite that simple. In a survey of 300 U.S. hiring managers, 71% said higher application volume has made it harder to find qualified candidates, while 93% said they have lost…

If you’ve used artificial intelligence to help write something recently, you’re in good company. So have we.

Every March, thousands of graduating medical students anxiously await one of the most important moments of their careers: Match Day. Headlines quickly follow, celebrating record participation, growing residency programs, and another successful year for physician training.

Every recruitment campaign has one goal: convince the right person to apply.

When a critical position goes unfilled, most organizations immediately focus on replacing it. Recruiters begin sourcing candidates, hiring managers review resumes, and leadership discusses timelines. But while everyone is focused on filling the vacancy, something else begins happening almost immediately.

For years, physician recruitment has followed a familiar formula. Health systems have focused on highlighting compensation, clinical opportunities, technology, and career growth to attract candidates. While these factors remain critical, today’s physicians are making career decisions through a much broader lens.

Not long ago, physician recruitment followed a fairly straightforward process. A recruiter would reach out to a candidate, introduce an opportunity, answer questions, and serve as the primary source of information throughout the hiring journey. If a physician wanted to learn about compensation, organizational culture, leadership, call expectations, or the surrounding community, the recruiter was…